I read a message somewhere from a guy who collected test equipment. I was both envious and frightened; envious that he was doing it because I could easily see myself doing it too, and frightened because I could easily see myself doing it too.
Like the oscilloscope below, this was something The Old Man acquired from one of his friends; he said they'd been used in one of the shops where he'd worked. The only time I ever saw him actually use it was when his Hickok signal generator died and we tried to use this one instead, and it was just a debacle. Now I have it.
In theory it's a hell of a machine; it's one of those swiss-army-knives that's supposed to do a variety of important things if you're working on transistor radios. There's 0-12VDC power supply with enough juice to run a car radio. There's a signal generator that covers AM and FM broadcast and IF frequencies. There's a transistor tester, both in and out of circuit, and a simple VOM.
So far I've only used the signal generator, and the "birdies" were too numerous to make it useful. But maybe some day I'll find a use for this. Looks good on the shelf, though.
Current Conditon: works
It seems like I saw one of these once, and I can't remember if it was too expensive (probably) and I never expected that I would work on televisions, so I didn't get it. This time I picked it up for what I thought was a reasonable price ($35) and my Old Man wasn't around to talk me out of it. I've got two ailing televisions and I figure that if this thing can help, it will be worth it.
It gets some good word-of-mouth on the internet. Phil's Old Radios has a nice page on it, as does LabGuy's World. The Model 1077 was reviewed in the June 1969 edition of Electronic Technician magazine—it may or not have been the 1077B. I found an ad for the 1077B specifically in 1970. And finally there are YouTube videos (you can find those yourself) because of course there are.
This is a TV signal generator. It provides a variety of different signals, both audio and video, that you can feed into the TV being serviced. I won't list all the stuff, but the niftiest thing, in my opinion, is that it has a scanner inside and you make your own test pattern, which the TV will pick up. Or you can use theirs. This originally came with three or four slides for both B&W and color.
Mine's in-transit as I write this, so I don't know if it works or not, or whether it has the test target slides (I hope it does but I suspect they're all missing). Word on the street is that I can make my own using transparency film (the kind you used to use on overhead projectors). I downloaded an old indian-chief test pattern (Wikipedia has a nice one), so we'll see.
Then I get to lug my old (vintage 2004 or so) Sharp TV out of the barn, because that's the only working TV I have that's the old NTSC (never twice the same color) standard. It rivals the Predicta for weight and awkwardness in moving.
Current Conditon: to be determined
The Old Man was an electronics tech at work; at home he dabbled with projects but most didn't require a scope. When I was growing up he had an old Dumont that I thought was great, but it was also very limited. That was given away, and eventually replaced with three or four B&K's a friend gave him. Those slowly disappeared until he was left with this one, which was given to me when I took the intro-to-electronics class. It was "take it and don't bring it back!" It freed up space on his bench for more useful things for what he did, and he could still borrow it back from me if he needed it.
It's a nice scope. By modern standards I'd call it middle-tier. It's analog and everything new is digital. At school we used a Tektronix which was very, very similar but a bit newer, and I don't think it had any additional features that I needed.
Every so often I come across one of those big, impressive looking modular Tektronics rigs and I imagine where it would go on my bench. But so far I have yet to need a scope and not have the B&K do what was needed, so there's no real reason to replace or suppliment it.
Now if I find an old Dumont cheap...
Current Conditon: works fine.
My third frequency counter, after the HP 5308 (below) died on me.* It's a lot simpler than the HP: it's single channel, there are only two slide switches, one selector switch and a knob. I had some trouble trying it out so I ended up reading the book, but for what I do (verifying the actual frequency output of RF signal generators) you shouldn't need the book. You set the Freq/Time switch to Frequency, set the attenuator to X1 because the voltage we're going to see is very small, put the trigger knob to 0 (which seems to be where it's happy), and start with the selector at 1S.
It reads out directly in kHz, but it has enough positions that you can read up to 100 MHz—you just to have to remember it's in kHz.
The key to using it with RF signal generators, at least the ones I use like my Hickok 288X or my RCA WR-49A, is to crank up the generator's output to full power: on the Hickok it's RFx100 and 100% output; on the RCA it's the high output jack and the RF attention all the way clockwise. A strong signal gives a stable signal. Then back it down when you feed the signal into a radio.
One feature I find lacking on this is an unpluggable cable. It comes straight out the back and there's no loom to hold it; so if you coil it and tie it up, you end up with a sort of pony tail sticking out the back. No big deal if you leave it on your bench, but it's irritating if you want to store it. The HP's cord unplugs, which sounds trivial but it's a nice feature.
This was one of the rarest of eBay creates I've seen in recent years: it was priced very reasonably, it had a low (accurate) shipping cost, and the owner had tested it and knew that it works. It amazes me how many I things I see that are priced outrageously, or priced reasonably but they want a godawful shipping amount, and regardless, they have no idea whether it works or not other than a power light comes on when it's plugged in.
* at least temporarily.
Current Conditon: needs a recent test.
When I was growing up, The Old Man had a Du Mont o-scope on the garage workbench shelf. I think I saw him use it once, maybe twice. He didn't use scopes much, but it was there if he needed it.
We moved and he gave it away—one less thing to pack. I thought it was neat and wanted one, but you just don't see these often. I don't, anyway.
I don't even think this was my dad's model, I remember his being fewer controls, but it's got the big black Dumont frotn panel, and the name, so I'm happy. It was $13 at Goodwill, so I jumped on it. Plus I also wanted an old scope because they are not quite like modern ones. These are frequency based; time-basing was Tektronics's baby, and Du Mont thought it was too expensive to produce for sale.
Oscilloscope Museum says this is a military scope from 1943. They determined that because they've got a Navy version with a OBL-I model number.
From their source, the technical manual for this is NAVSHIPS 900227(A). A copy appears to be in the East Carolina University US Navy Dept Bureau of Shps Publication Collection, Manuscript Collection #830, Box 12, folder d. Now if I can just get a copy of that . . .
Tubes: 3BP1, 2X2, four 6SJ7, 6X5, 884
If you want to see inside it, check out Teardown Tuesday.
Current Conditon: not tested.
Sounds impressive doesn't it? This is another magic-eye machine. Thankfully mine still works. This was another one from the great radio-test-equipment purge from The Old Man's bench.
These are relatively common, I've seen them for sale on eBay and elsewhere.
Another item with a weak eye tube (moron this below). This one takes a 1629. They're supposedly less expensive than 6E5s and 6U5s, but not as much as they used to be.
This one works backward (to my mind). You hook up a capacitor and then turn the dial until the eye tube iris is at its widest, and that's your reading. Usually eye tubes are set so you close them until the leaves just touch, and that's your optimum.
I've only used it a little bit. It tests electrolytics, and I've got a big 2-stage can in a chassis that I don't want to replace if I don't have to, so I'm going to try and test it in place (I'll disconnect the ground to take it out of the circuit). If it saves me having to pull that can, it'll be worth the price of a new eye tube right there.
SO, here's one that gets booked to "tuition." I mentioned earlier that the magic eye was weak. I had to turn off the overhead lights to see it. So I added it to my shopping list and ordered a replacement. Actually I ordered two because I like to have a backup in inventory in case I need one again.
After I ordered the tube, I was messing with machine again and noticed I was getting shocked on the cabinet. And not just a little, I was getting a pretty good zap; the bypass capacitor on the power transformer's primary side was leaky as hell. So I cleaned the face up a bit with naval jelly and put it back together. Looks nice, works nice. (Until I actually did a test, when I got shocked again. If I'd bothered to look harder at the schematic, I'd have found that big .25 @ 600V job that also bypasses to chassis ground. But back to the story...)
Now the eye glows beautifully. It wasn't weak, the damned leaky bypass cap was shunting power and lowering the operating voltage.
So now I have two 1629s on the way. I need none, but wouldn't mind one to put in the tube caddy; but two? For awhile I was thinking I could use a 1629 to replace an "expensive" 6E5/6U5, but the prices really aren't much different anymore.
Anyway, the moral is if you have a weak eye tube, test it on a tube checker (or something else that uses them) because it may be fine.
This guy is on Teardown Tuesday to show the complicated inner workings.
Current Conditon: works fine.
Another electronics class acquisition—I wanted to be able to do some of the labs at home. Plus I enjoy building kits. Elenco has a few, and this function generator looked both interesting and useful. I was very happy with it; it's fairly easy to build (I was able to do it), the instructions were clear, and ultimately I had something I could use for experiments.
I checked its output on the scope and the wave forms (it puts out sine, triangle and square) all looked great; the square is rounded off at the top speed (1 Mhz) but still perfectly good for what I was doing. Also gave me some practice for my marginal soldering skills. The only bad part is that its output isn't strong enough to align radios.
Current Conditon: works fine.
Another item from The Old Man's bench purge. There's no history behind that I know of. It's one of the very few pieces pieces of Heath equipment that he owned. I haven't found the manual for it yet, and no history.
Haven't used it yet. The Old Man used it as a audio-frequency generator.
I know that this is a particularly crappy photo. I'll try it again when I have more time and energy to light it properly.
Current Conditon: needs a recent test
When I was getting into ham radio, I read all kinds of stuff about how useful a grid-dip meter can be. All the ones I came across on flea-bay or in thrift shops were the same: sold by people who had no idea what they were but priced high. Does it work? Don't know. Does it have the coils? It comes with coils? What are those? I never saw one under $50. If it did have coils, it at least $100.
Found this one at a thrift shop, priced at $10 so I snatched it up. Does it work? Dunno. Does it have the coils? Hell no. But at least it was only $10.
Made in the mid-1950s (don't know how long they made it). There's an ad in the Sept 1957 issue of Radio Electronics that names it, priced at $20 (with coils). American Radio History.com has a bunch of Heathkit catalogs (but not all); I found it in the 1958 edition, but the 1961 catalog has a different model (HM-10).
Current Condition: needs coils, testing
Purchased for $15 at a thirft store. Turned out it had no tubes, and it takes a dozen of them. None of them are pricey but together they add up. I have about half of them, so I'll have to order the rest.
If anyone cares, the tube compliment is: one 12AT7, two 5965s, three 6AL5s, one 6463, one 5725, a 6AU5, a 6CB6, an OB2, and a 5Y3. They also count two NE-2 neon bulbs as tubes.
This will be on Teardown Tuesday when I outfit it and see if it works.
This is an early frequency counter. The bad part (for me) is that it only goes to 100 KHz, which makes it not very useful for most radio work.
Richard Sears has a nice write-up on his Vintage Electronics page.
Current Conditon: needs to be tested.
Purchased because it was cheap ($30) and my Heath freak counter (no longer on this page) never panned out.
This one works, though like most things I seem to get, it is not quite right. The HP system here is actually two halves married together: the upper half (display) is a 5300A Measuring System, and the lower half is the 5308A freq counter. So after scouring the net, I finally found some documentation on this thing, and the first thing I read is the 5308A only works with the 5300B measuring system.
Oh, joy. So that's why it was cheap. Stung by fleaBay again. But it arrived and I fired it up anyway, hoping the previous owner had actually used it with the 5300A top, and it wasn't just slapped together to sell.
It does work: the 5300A has a six-place readout, and the 5300B has eight places. In various modes the left-most digits get truncated on this thing. So the trick is that instead of using the auto-ranging feature, you set the time base manually and you can keep it within the 6-digit range. At least I've been able to do that so far.
In case anyone cares about the specs, it's 75MHz. Two inputs and you can do ratios and comparisons between the two. It's a counter and a timer, so you can do a variety of things with it that I know nothing about.
Funny—if it didn't say HP on it, I'd swear it was a mate to my B&K scope. They definitely have the same look and feel.
So I mentioned above that this thing died on me and I bought another machine to replace it. I don't know what happened other than I turned it on and got 9999999 and nothing could clear it. Months later, when I was testing the other meter, I thought I'd plug this in again and see what it did; and it works fine. Or at least it does at the moment. Maybe it doesn't like the idea of going back on eBay again.
Current Conditon: works when it feels like it.
The companion to the old man's Hickok 288X signal generator (below), circa 1946. This one is about the size of a 7-1/2" reel-recorder or a stand-alone record player, so it's pretty impressive.
It's designed to be a signal tracer, or really several pieces of equipment in a single package. There's something for each stage of the radio. Unlike other tracers of the time, such as my Rider Chanalyst, this one used analog meters instead of magic eye tubes.
It originally came with a set of five probes; mine has one and it's shot. I'll have to make them up from scratch.
Unfortunately, this is on my Dead shelf. It wasn't working when I got it and I didn't help it any. I recapped it using my old method (unsolder the leads at the terminals, which makes for a nice, professional look when you put the new ones on, but it's easier than I thought to put things back incorrectly; the "new" method is to snip the cap off and solder to the original lead stubs). Anyway, there's a short and smoke. I keep saying I'll pull it out again and really go through it methodically and see if I can figure out where things are sideways, but I've got about sixteen other things ahead of it.
Mine came with the original manual, click on the PDF icon to the left. BAMA has two perfectly good ones, but one is very high contrast (which makes it easier to read) and a low-contrast one (easier for photos), but I find both are less than ideal to read. Since modern scanners are generally better, and the price of storage and internet bandwidth is much lower than it used to be, I attempted a higher-quality scan.
Current Conditon: botched; needs to be gone through properly.
The companion to the 156 Trace-o-Meter above. A shame the tracer doesn't work because they'd look great together on my bench.
This was The Old Man's signal generator. I got it when he purged his workbench of the last of his radio test gear, because I'm the only one using it anyway and it frees up space for more useful things. But this carried a lot of sentimental attachment. He bought it new and used it when he was a professional tech. And it's been on his bench wherever we lived for as long as I can remember.
This came out in 1946. The X means it's crystal controlled. The model 277 is similar but lacks the audio meter on the left. Hickok's owner's manual covered all three so there isn't too much difference between them.
It's impressive, I'll give it that. It makes my RCA (below) look like a toy. I just got it and haven't had a chance to get it yet; an influx of new stuff means I have to reorganize and remodel the shelves above my bench in order to fit everything in, and that will take some time.
Current Conditon: works.
Some thrift shops I go to have a pegboard wall where they take this-n-that, wrap it in a clear plastic bag and hang it up for sale at a small price. I typically see silverware, small toys and magic tricks, card games, cheap headphones, lots of power cords and hookup cables, you name it. Once I found a Polaroid SX-70. And just before Christmas of 2018, I found this. Price: $7
This amazes me. It's about the size of a paperback book. Came with its AC cord and a couple of nice probes, which are worth the $7 by themselves. It hooks up to the computer via a mini USB cable, which was not included but they're commonly available.
Link Instruments was kind enough to send me the software and instructions on how to load this onto my system.
more to come (tbd)
Current Conditon: works fine.
Another item I bought for convoluted reasons. I wanted to learn how to work on and align old tube radios. You don't need a lot of stuff for that, but you need a few things like a signal generator (and maybe a tube tester).
So I began looking around for something I could afford. The old man has a Hickok 288X which he loves; I thought about getting one but it seemed pointless to have two of them in the family, so I thought I'd look for something else (plus the only 288X I found was too pricey for me). There are lots of Heaths and Eicos out there, but I'm always extra leary of kits that other people built, unless the prices were wonderful and they weren't. Eventually I came across this RCA and thought it fit the bill.
It's simple, small and light (about the size and weight of a lunch box) and it works, which is all that I really ask. I mostly use it in conjunction with the HP freq meter by setting the generator and then checking the output on the HP. The key to that is to run the output all the way up for the HP, then turn it back down again to work on the radio.
Mikeyancey.com has a copy of RCA's 1958 Radio and TV course. Study Group 16, Service Practices 31: AM and FM Signal Generators, includes a discussion of this signal generator in particular (starts on page 6 of the PDF). Click on the PDF icon for the link.
Current Conditon: works fine
I really bought this because I'm a sucker for magic eye tubes, and this one has four. Four! If all of them go out, you'll go broke replacing them.
But I also wanted another shot at a signal tracer, because my Hickok (above) is dead and I haven't been able to fix it.
There's a fair amount of information about this sprinkled across the internet. Phil's Old Radios has a nice write-up on it, including how to make it play as a TRF radio; Boatanchor Pix has three of them; and Steve Johnson has some documentation for free; there's more if you want to Google around for it.
There's also a two-part article that ran in the October and November 1938 issues of Radio Craft magazine, written by Rider, talking about how it works and how it is meant to be used. I transcribed the article as a webpage here.
John F. Rider was a writer/publisher of radio servicing books; his heyday was the 1930s and 40s. His most famous work was the Rider Perpetual Troubleshooter's Manual, which was an annual collection of service literature that he could reasonably collect together. For people who work on old radios, Riders PTMs are still useful today; the major makers' (RCA, Philco, Zenith, etc.) literature may be available elsewhere, but for the smaller fry, it's Rider or nothing.
But Rider was also an early and big proponent of servicing by signal-tracing, whereby you go can test each stage of the radio and see whether the signal is present and, if so, if it's weak or strong. That rapidly localizes the problem.
I don't know how widely these were used; from what I've seen and heard, not that much. Most professionals knew that most of the problems they encountered fell into recognizable, similar categories, and they could quickly figure out what the problem was and knew by experience what to do to fix it; and few of them wanted to lug yet another big piece of equipment into a customer's home if he didn't absolutely have to. So I think the signal-tracers were more likely used for learning, which is what I wanted to do. If I learn how to use a signal tracer, it'll help me in my understanding of radio overall.
Mine arrived and of course, it's DOA. Photos and discussion in Teardown Tuesday.
Current Conditon: works
A garage-sale find—$20, which is great if it works and it does. It's a portable single-channel job, circa mid 1970s.
The plastic back-pack on top holds the probes and the AC cord; there's also a removable cover (not shown here).
I'd say this about the size of a 70s/80s era automobile CB radio—truly portable, not luggable like the B&K above. This is an AC/DC model with an internal rechargable battery.
When I got it, the internal battery was shot (no surprise there), but did work on AC. Now (a couple years later) I just tried it and it's dead on AC, but I do get something when I feed external battery power in. I haven't really worked with it to see if it'll work properly on external DC, or what. Who knows. I'm hoping a fuse is blown, but that would be too easy.
The manual for it is available. Link goes to BAMA.
Current Conditon: NiCad batteries are shot, and won't work on AC in that condition for reasons I don't understand (but it's mentioned in the manual). Does work if you feed it external DC. I'm tempted to buy new NiCads and repack the battery, but since I only rarely use this, the batteries would probably die again from disuse. So now if I want to run it, I have to hook it to a DC power supply.
I always get Superior and Supreme confused. Superior was an inexpensive brand that sold mail order and on time installments in advertising in the back pages of many magazines. Supreme was, according to Alan Douglas, a quality brand from Greenwood, Mississippi.
This is a set tester—a swiss-army knife of tools in a single box. It combines a tube tester, a volt-ohm-milliammeter (AC and DC), and can measure and test capacitors, both eletrolytics and electrostatics, for leakage. Not bad for 1936. The idea was that a field tech would enter the home with this and a toolbox/tube-caddy and be able to do almost anything to a typical set.
I bought this from an online auction for about what it cost brand new. I was mistaken in that I thought it had two magic eyes; it actually has none. One is a neon lamp used to capacitor leak tests, and the other is the 71A tube that acts as a high-voltage rectifier.
The manual for it is available. Link goes to Steve Johnson.
Current Conditon: in transit. Needs evaluation.